Low-Fat Isn't Always Better
0 Comments Published by Admin aka Mimin on Thursday, September 20, 2007 at 3:44 PM.
Women who follow a low-fat diet may not be getting as many essential nutrients as they should, according to the findings of a 27,000-person U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) study.
More than half the women who reduced their fat intake to less than 30 percent of total calories were short-changing themselves on vitamins A and E, calcium, folic acid, iron and zinc.
This, in turn, places them at greater risk for osteoporosis, pregnancy-related problems and, perhaps, certain types of cancerWhile a low-fat diet is recommended for the prevention of obesity, breast cancer, diabetes and heart disease, following a low-fat diet at the expense of nutrients is not a wise choice.
Instead, women - and men as well - should follow a diet that is varied and balanced, low in fat and high in essential nutrients.
For some, supplementation may be in order. For others, simply choosing high-nutrient foods over high-sugar, low-fat foods can make a positive difference in overall health.
Source: Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, April 19, 1998Labels: Info
0 Responses to “Low-Fat Isn't Always Better”